Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11

[loki]

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.co...-question.html

Terry Arnold: The nature of events in New York. The buildings falling down. I'm not satisfied by the notion that planes hitting buildings constructed as these would have caused them to collapse. The last building to fall was not even attacked.

Oh, dear god...'the last building was not hit by a plane'. No, you moron, it was hit by thousands of tons of debris. Jesus wept...

Terry Arnold: The sheer mechanics of the event. The chances of two buildings of that height and structure merely collapsing in their own footprint are extremely slim.

The 'sheer mechanics"? Meaning???
And, no doubt, you have proof that the 'mechanics' were wrong??? And you can no doubt tell us what the chances should have been, instead of 'slim'?

Ye gods, more fruitcakes.

And, can you explain why the construction of the buildings should have caused a different outcome?

I'm sure the NIST engineers, and the buildings designers, would be FASCINATED to hear your comments....lol!

Ehhhhh Ehhhhhh Ehhhhhh

Sure - Asymmetrical Ballistic Damage followed by Asymmetrical Fire damage - Always brings buildings down Symmetrically at almost free-fall speed through the path of most resistance - isn't that right P W?

Ehhhhh ehhhhhh Ehhhhhh

You really ARE on medication, aren't you?

You sure do keep it sweat PW!

Sure we ALL have medication right, how else would we fall for all the Government Horse shit you keep selling PW?

Ehhhhhh Ehhhhhh ehhhhhh

911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!

911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!

911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!

911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!

911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!

911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!

911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!

911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!

911 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB!

There -- that feels better

2 + 2 = 5

2 + 2 = 5

2 + 2 = 5

2 + 2 = 5

2 + 2 = 5

2 + 2 = 5

You tell em P W!


Ehhhhh Ehhhhhh ehhhhh

Then pesky no good trooooooooooofers don't have a clue!