Go Back   World News Forum - Open Publishing > Off Topic > The Fringe

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2009, 03:16 PM
loki loki is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,579
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
loki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of light
Default Foreknowledge of 9/11 Twin Towers Collapse?

Live British news coverage on September 11 appears to suggest WTC officials already understood the dynamics of the first tower's collapse and could predict with some degree of certainty the imminent collapse of the second tower. How?

Reply With Quote
sponsor links
  #2  
Old 02-02-2009, 05:22 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No doubt paul w will have the answer for us when he gets back to work.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2009, 05:56 AM
Beavis & Butthead
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CIA/Mosad Megaphoney HQ

Ehhhh Ehhhhh Ehhhhh

P W could not come into work today because he is too buisy torturing, I mean, Interigating a prisner.

So he sent me & Butthead to do his lying, I mean his Bullshit, I mean his stupid answers - for him.


Ehhhhh Ehhhhhh ehhhhhh

Was it because the whole thaing was an Inside Job and the press were spoonfed the offical bullshit story?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2009, 08:14 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Links of truth

Even a person of very low intellect can work this one out Paul W, when he gets back from torturing his prisoners.











Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2009, 05:37 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-07-2009, 12:40 AM
paul w
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default classroom basics

Re the first (Loki) video...

Here is the reality on the day; one Tower had already collapsed. The second Tower, just like the first, was also hit by a plane and, just like the first, had a huge and uncontrolled fire raging...so here's my question; does it suprise any of you that many people thought it might also collapse?

And....the offical website for the Towers stated that the 'skin' of the Tower was integral to its performace, and once that skin was compromised, so was the structure itself. Clearly then, it was compromised.

The firefighters, for example, immediately started to pull their people out of the second tower when the first came down. Is that suprising? And are you lot saying you would have kept them in there? Hmmm. Really?

Fuck me drunk, what is about this stuff you lot don't understand?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-07-2009, 12:50 AM
paul w
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As for WTC7...

Hours before it collapsed, uncontrolled fires were raging on multiple floors, a huge gash (from Tower debris) covered a full one third of the building, and it was 'bulging' on one corner.

What do ya reckon? Possibility of collapse? Safer to leave it alone (everyone was out) than risk lives trying to fight the fires inside? Or would you have gone in?

Oh, and by the way, read a report a few years ago from a firefighter in the Towers. He remembers looking up a lift shaft to see it was buckled, and realised that was a very, very bad sign that the building's structure was seriously damaged. He expected a possible collapse.

Why do Truthers never mention these comments? And if you want more, there are many first-hand accounts on the numerous firefighter websites. Go read them.

All this is explained in www.911myths.com

This is all old news, completely debunked. But why spoil a perfectly good fantasy?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-07-2009, 02:08 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul w View Post
Re the first (Loki) video...

Is that suprising?
Umm, well actually yes, very surprising indeed that all three buildings should fall (one due to fire) in one day, when no steel framed skyscraper had ever collapsed due to fire before, so yes, it is a little difficult to comprehend.
Have we had a public inquiry into this yet? if not then maybe we should, that might clear things up a little.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2009, 01:42 AM
paul w
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default another rock-solid, logical reply...Lol!

So, you completely ignored my argument as to why they figured WTC7 could fall (uncontrolled fires raging on multiple floors, a huge gash from Tower debris a full one third of the building, and it was 'bulging' on one corner) with the argument that how can it happen when it's never happened before?

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2009, 02:40 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul w View Post
'bulging' on one corner"

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Bulging on one corner, What happens next?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


Breaking News | Conspiracy DVDs Cheap DVDs | SEO Tutorials | Debt help | Morecambe Hotels | Underground Internet Marketing