Hatemongering Zionists celeberate the death of children in Gaza

Quote.
"nothing good is going to come out of it until they go all the way with it, until they wipe them all out."

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=1HQZw5JTAE8

[shankyrhodes]

it is a Style of Hatemongering Zionists celeberate the death of children in Gaza. This is a Historical Realign .


Bristol street art advertising


http://www.dirtystreetadvertising.com
info@dirtystreetadvertising.com
0800 4118 752

Whenever you talk to any muslim you will see the following tricks being used :-

"Al Taqiyya is with tongue only; not the heart. A believer can make any statement
as long as the ‘heart is comfortable'. The 9/11 terrorists lived and visited in the
United States for two years before the 9/11 attacks. How did they acculturate?
By the use of taqiyya. Meaning: I hate you but I smile at you-in public.

Taqiyya and ‘Outwitting’ in contemporary political discourse and debates.

Outwitting:-
Islamic spokesmen commonly use taqiyya as a form of ‘outwitting’. The matter
under discussion is not to be debated or discussed; rather the opponent is to
‘outwitted’ through taqiyya, by diversion of the subject and obfuscation aided
at times with a mystical reference to God or Allah.

The claim that difficulties in translating from Arabic to English make

communication
with non-Arab speakers difficult or impossible, is another form of outwitting.
The tactical use of a translator offers considerable advantage.

Role playing as victim:-
Claiming to be 'the victim’ of religious discrimination and intolerance during
debate or discussion is another form of distraction and ‘outwitting’.

Manipulating ambiguity:
Sheik Hilaly of Sydney, Australia is on public record as (a) ’condemning’ the
9/11 attacks in ambiguous terms and (b) praising suicide and martyr operations
However, Islamic spokesmen will rarely condemn a specific act of terrorism and
direct questions will be skillfully evaded.

Diversion:
For example, questions relating to the 9/11 terrorists attacks will be diverted
by a causally irrelevant counter reference to the plight of the Palestinians, the
nefarious role of Israel and US foreign policy and support for Israel as ‘causes’
of terrorism.

Anti-Semitism, a core belief of Islamic fundamentalism is also skillfully diverted
by misleading and exaggerated historical references to the alleged status

enjoyed
by Jews and non-believers under Islamic rule, thereby deflecting critical

examination
of the virulent contemporary Islamic anti-Semitism.

Demanding ’evidence’:
Islamic spokesmen practice a form of taqiyya defined in psychology as
‘cognitive denial’ by repetitive and extreme requests for ‘evidence’ and ‘proof’
of alleged terrorist acts, which they know cannot be disclosed.

Tactical denial:
Rather than admitting that a proposition concerning a state of affairs can be
partly true, an Islamic spokesman will deny a claim or proposition in absolute

terms.
For example, “It is impossible to be a Muslim and a terrorist’ , which is false and
‘Islam forbids suicide’, which is true, but irrelevant as suicide or martyrdom

attacks
are not forbidden in the Koran.

Exploiting cognitive dissonance:
Islamic spokesman tend to be baffle television interviewers and puzzle viewers

as
they resort to double talk ‘clichés and platitudes’ concerning Islam. A state of
cognitive dissonance-holding two contradictory beliefs and attempting to resolve
them- is induced in viewers as they attempt to process the claim that Islam is a
peaceful religion with the dissonant facts of Islamic terrorist acts and operations.

The Islamic ’defence’ script:
Islamic spokesmen repeat the same predictable platitudes concerning Islam in
London as do Islamic spokesmen in Seattle and often appear to follow a

prepared
script from “Islam is tolerant and peace loving’ to the claim by Islamic

spokeswomen
invariably claiming that wearing the veil offers them more freedom
(women in Muslim countries are therefore ‘freer’ than women in western

countries),
thereby precluding further examination into the real status of women under

Islamic rule.

Islamic platitudes are also echoed uncritically by Western politicians, for example
”A small group of fundamentalists have hijacked a great religion’. The timely,

skilful,
misleading and diversionary theme of the ‘hijacking’ of Islam was introduced into
public, political and media discourse by an Islamic ‘spokesmen’ in the United

States
shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

The “Islam has been hijacked’ diversionary theme is now a conventional media

and
political reference deflecting attention from empirical and historical examination

of
the doctrinal, political and religious continuity of Islamic terrorism. A related

theme
that a small minority of Muslims are engaged in terrorism is utterly irrelevant as

Islamic
terrorism is always perpetrated by ‘small minorities’ or more accurately’ small

groups’.

Taqiyya as impressions and perceptions management

The tactical use of children:
Television viewers noted that interviews with
terrorist suspects raided by security authorities invariably featured veiled women
holding small children or a baby as they protested their husband’s innocence

and
attested to his innate goodness. Trembling fingers pointed to ‘damage’ to the

family
residence. In some interviews the suspect / father holds the child, whilst denying
involvement or knowledge of terrorism in any sense of the word: an example of
taqiyya in the age of impressions and perception management.

Taqiyya and the Deceptive use of Jihad:
The contemporary political meaning of jihad is clear: it is Jihad of the sword.
Egyptian-based Islamic fundamentalists, from whom Bin Laden recruited his key
operatives, believe jihad is the fourth pillar of Islam and is a binding belief and
integral to the faith. Claiming that Jihad is a subjective and psychological state of
personal struggle is taqiyya. In contemporary terms, Jihad means - holy war -
against unbelievers and it in this context that Al Qaeda training manuals refer to
Jihad as ‘Holy War’.

The study of taqiyya and kitman is crucial to an understanding of Islamic
fundamentalism and terrorism ranging from the issuing of false terrorist threats,
operational and strategic disinformation issued by Al Qaeda in the form of

‘intelligence chatter’ to the use of taqiyya and kitman by terrorists during interrogation and the use of systematically misleading expressions concerning Islam and terrorism by Muslim ‘spokesmen’.

1. Muhammad advocates lying: "Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying,
"O Allah's Apostle! Would you like that I kill him [Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf]?"
The Prophet said, "Yes," Muhammad bin Maslama said, "Then allow me to say
a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab). "The Prophet said, "You may say it,"
(Hadith Vol. 5, Book 59, #369)."

This is how they have bullshitted many dhimmi's. C 4 YO'SELF.