Your NATO commanders tell it as it really is - Aliens are real!

On Wednesday, May 9th, 2001, over twenty military, intelligence, government, corporate and scientific witnesses came forward at the National Press Club in Washington, DC to establish the reality of UFOs or extraterrestrial vehicles, extraterrestrial life forms, and resulting advanced energy and propulsion technologies. The weight of this first-hand testimony, along with supporting government documentation and other evidence, will establish without any doubt the reality of these phenomena.


http://www.disclosureproject.org/

http://www.netro.ca/disclosure/npccmenu.htm


Don't worry they don't bite, if they were dangerous you would already be dead.

[Nostalgia]

Moved to fringe.

So which bit is questionable research?

[Nostalgia]

UFOs are considered fringe material here.
If I post anything to do with Aliens or UFOs, I put it in the fringe.

[loki]

Dont take it personal Unregistered, Nostalgia is our fringe expert around here, we're both with you on the article and probably both ardently believe in the veracity of the claim, but its still considered fringe.

[Nostalgia]

Originally Posted by loki

Dont take it personal Unregistered, Nostalgia is our fringe expert around here, we're both with you on the article and probably both ardently believe in the veracity of the claim, but its still considered fringe.

Thanks Loki, although I do not know if I a fringe expert, there are things that I post in the fringe that I do have an interest in, and there is other stuff I post just to keep the fringe section interesting while keeping in mind that others might be interested.
But as Loki says unregistered, do not take it personally, if we keep this kind of material in the fringe then people who are used to the site know where to look for it.
Would I like some fringe information to go on the front page, yes I would, but then RINF might be taken over as a conspiracy site rather than a news site that posts real but alternative news.
There has to be a balance.

So you can now see how easy it is to program even the most intelligent and articulate person.

I do agree about keeping RINF a serious alternative news resource, so the answer would be to have a third section in the bin area were good circumstantial evidence can be accumulated.

How about "Alternative Opinion" or "Silenced whistle-blowers" or "Far From Fringe"?

[Nostalgia]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

So you can now see how easy it is to program even the most intelligent and articulate person.

I do agree about keeping RINF a serious alternative news resource, so the answer would be to have a third section in the bin area were good circumstantial evidence can be accumulated.

How about "Alternative Opinion" or "Silenced whistle-blowers" or "Far From Fringe"?

Unregistered, why don't you join up then you could put your ideas to the editorial board. nobody has to know who you are, as all you need to be if you want to be is an avatar.
After all, I do not have a clue who Loki is, and on the plus side you get the use of all the features which can be really handy especially if you want to get your message over using images.
And as for being programmed, it can actually work both ways as it actually helps when you know a little something about Edward Bernays or the Tavistock Institute.

!

[Thinking Man's Idiot]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

So which bit is questionable research?

To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions.

After 200,000years of homo-sapien evolution and thinking and despite all our advances in science we have yet to prove our separateness from a creator/creation, spirits, faeries and super-humans, alien life visiting earth, and all other comforts from reality that we as a species have a tendency for. Facts are facts-events are events- there are truths and untruths (Winston Smith).

Speculation and theory are quite different. Tangible proof is needed to get rid of this fringe section, otherwise it stays.

The opium of the people.


Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man—state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d'honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion. Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.