Time to take control
(Tuesday 30 September 2008)
JEREMY CORBYN warns the government that it must act in the best interests of ordinary people.
Monday saw a classic political pincer movement in the United States.
The ultra-neoconservative right opposed George W Bush's plan for saving Wall Street on the grounds that it was interfering with the free market.
The more radical Democrat members of the House of Representatives voted it down because it would bail out Wall Street, which has fallen victim of its own greed and excesses.
The plan's defeat was a product of the revulsion felt by large numbers of people at risk of losing their homes, their pensions and their jobs. They were appalled at the prospect of the US Congress handing $700bn with few strings attached to the very people who had created this mess in the first place.
Across the Atlantic, in one dizzying day, banks in Britain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and Iceland were taken into public ownership in whole or part. Every central bank - what remains of them, at least - was pumping money into the system to try to shore up share prices.
Twenty-eight years ago, power was in the hands of Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and the monetarists. Deregulation, the sale of council houses, "freedom" for City traders and building society demutualisation were the order of the day.
This process ran its course. Later, the Clinton and Blair governments rode on the back of huge levels of personal debts, cheap Chinese imports and a galloping financial market that resembled the South Sea bubble on a global scale.
We are now witnessing the wreckage.
In Britain, it has created a perpetual housing crisis with high prices, high rents and overcrowding. People are locked into the system and want prices to remain high.
Every single building society that was driven by greed into accepting demutualisation has either been swallowed up, disappeared or nationalised. The safest banks are the mutuals like Nationwide and Britannia, which extol their mutuality as their unique selling point.
Last weekend, the broadsheet papers were full of dramatic blow-by-blow accounts of events.
But they were written in the confident expectation that it would all be over once Congress had approved the Bush plan.
But Congress did not.
Now, we are in for a few more days of debate about the ins and outs of the process. US presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama, both desperate to appear "responsible," rolled up, backed the plan and then left town.
What happened to the rhetoric in the primaries about "change?"
Nationalisation does not necessarily mean socialism, as Rob Griffiths correctly pointed out in Monday's Morning Star.
Taking a bank into public ownership is a good and necessary first step to protect savers and jobs, but it does not fundamentally change a system unless the process develops from there.
The media tells us that experts and gurus with special deity-like qualities of perception such as Warren Buffet can understand what is happening at the moment. We will get through it and all will ultimately be well.
We need to be far more assertive on the left.
The government has been pursuing a totally unfair pay policy in the public sector for a while. The burden of private finance initiative payments looms large.
Deregulation and the active pursuit of inequality and appeal to greed plunged us into crisis.
The victims will be the people who are excluded from the world of hedge funds, offshore accounts and City bonuses and now face job losses, the effects of public spending cuts and lost pensions.
There are things that the left could be doing.
We need to demand very strong regulation of the banking and credit system, protection for pensions and for people whose homes are threatened by foreclosure.
The case for public ownership of the major banks is irrefutable.
When the Chancellor and the Prime Minister sit down and become midwives of mergers such as the one between HBOS and Lloyds TSB or part sales such as Bradford and Bingley to Santander, we need to ask who is accountable and what policies will be followed in future.
Tax revenues are already falling. They will fall further. This raises huge question marks over the maintenance of public services.
The government has been pursuing a totally unfair pay policy in the public sector for a while. The burden of private finance initiative payments looms large.
We are in a new period when protecting public spending to meet social need should become the top priority.
The housing crisis is already a reality for tens of thousands of families forced to live in grossly overcrowded rented flats or people with mortgage burdens that rob a huge proportion of their salary.
This is the price of nearly 30 years of right-to-buy policies and lack of investment in new council housing. Any "social housing" that has been built has usually been tacked onto private-sector developments.
It is time to invest in council housing, to allow councils to buy unsold private developments and to enact powers to buy properties at risk of repossession and convert them into council tenancies.
The UK spends over £30 billion on "defence" every year. The war in Iraq has cost at least £9 billion in the last three years. Afghanistan is becoming more expensive and ever more bloody.
Extracting ourselves from these wars and pursuing peaceful investments instead makes financial sense.
The day before the US convulsions, while the Western media was full of market crystal ball-gazing, an altogether different agenda was taking shape over the border in Mexico.
There, an enormous demonstration was held in the capital led by Democratic Revolutionary Party leader Andrés Manuel López Obrador.
Hundreds of thousands of Mexicans poured onto the streets to oppose the privatisation of publicly owned oil company PEMEX.
The right-wing government argues that the firm needs investment and that foreign capital is the only answer.
This is exactly the same argument that has been used in Iraq and for public services all over the world. But Obrador and his supporters are instead demanding social justice and the protection of strategic resources vital to eliminate poverty.
Further south in Bolivia, the defeat of water privatisation in Cochabamba gave birth to the movement that propelled Evo Morales to the presidency and the Movement Towards Socialism into government.
The self-satisfied Western media seem to forget that millions who lose at the hands of the free market see no need to protect it.
None of the social movements in Latin America sees salvation in market forces. All regard the elimination of poverty, a society based on the needs of all and a planned economy as the way forward.
At the Tory conference in Birmingham, shadow chancellor George Osborne chose not to deliver a mea culpa for the Thatcher years. Instead, he declared that his party was there to defend the free market. He was cheered by the assembled rightwingers.
But deeply worried people all over the country want to see government action to protect them from market forces and speculators' greed.
After all, we do not have to be ruled by markets.
Jeremy Corbyn is Labour MP for Islington North. He can be contacted at corbynj@parliament.uk