Go Back   World News Forum - Open Publishing > News & Current Events - Front Page Headlines > World News & Latest Headlines

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2008, 09:18 AM
Nostalgia's Avatar
Nostalgia Nostalgia is offline
Jobsworth
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,448
Thanks: 11
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Nostalgia has much to be proud ofNostalgia has much to be proud ofNostalgia has much to be proud ofNostalgia has much to be proud ofNostalgia has much to be proud ofNostalgia has much to be proud ofNostalgia has much to be proud ofNostalgia has much to be proud of
Default 'Superbank' puts 40,000 jobs at risk

Lloyds TSB has agreed a £12bn emergency takeover of Halifax Bank of Scotland in a deal that could lead to 40,000 job cuts, the closure of hundreds of branches and financial pain for more than two million small shareholders.

Gordon Brown intervened to smooth the deal's passage amid fears that the alternative would have been bankruptcy for HBOS – or nationalisation. The Government believes that it can get the merger past competition rules because of the severity of the situation.

Ministers told City bosses that HBOS, with 15 million savers and 20 per cent of the entire mortgage market, was simply too important to be allowed to collapse. Two out of every five UK households are customers of the HBOS group, which holds one in every five pounds saved in Britain.

The merger, rushed through in under two days, is likely to lead to large-scale job losses and branch closures. HBOS employs more than 65,000 people in the UK and has 1,100 branches, while Lloyds TSB has 70,000 staff and 1,900 branches.

Yesterday saw the Dow Jones industrial average fall by almost 450 points to a three-year low, despite the US government's $85bn (£47bn) bailout of the insurance giant AIG. Fresh fears were also raised over the two remaining independent US banks, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, with shares falling 24 per cent and 13.9 per cent respectively.

In 2000, Royal Bank of Scotland cut 18,000 jobs when it bought NatWest. Industry sources said the cuts would be far greater from the Lloyds-HBOS deal, raising the UK estimate of financial sector job cuts to 110,000.

Graham Goddard, deputy general secretary of the union Unite, said last night: "Unite is calling for urgent talks at the highest level with the banks. We will not accept any compulsory redundancies as a result of this merger. The major job losses in the sector are fundamentally caused by precarious investments andtransactions by bankers pursuing large rewards. Staff working in the financial services must not pay the price for corporate greed."

Scotland's First Minister, Alex Salmond, launched a scathing attack yesterday on the "spivs and speculators" who he said had forced a "shotgun marriage" between the two banking groups. He said: "We should not have situations where well capitalised, properly funded financial institutions are subject to incredible speculative attack, and that drives them into decision-making which they otherwise might not have done."

HBOS's 2.1 million small shareholders are also set to lose. The deal, paid in Lloyds stock, will be worth 232p a share, less than a quarter of the pre-credit crunch price. HBOS, whose shares had lost half their value in the past five trading days, closing at 147p, has the biggest small investor base in the country, most of whom got their shares when Halifax demutualised in 1997. Roger Lawson of the UK Shareholders Association said: "It is very questionable whether HBOS shareholders should accept any cheap deal. Clearly the Government would like an arranged marriage."

The deal would be the end of Halifax, a former building society whose roots go back to 1853, as an independent company. In 2001, it merged with Bank of Scotland, founded in 1695, to take on Britain's big four banks but that dream was shattered as the credit crunch made HBOS pay for its massive expansion and reliance on debt markets. With house prices slumping and markets frozen, concerns about HBOS turned to panic this week.

The bank is Britain's biggest mortgage lender and has nearly a third of the country's buy-to-let and self-certified home loans. It has also lent and invested heavily in the commercial property sector, and the bank relies on wholesale markets for nearly half its funding. This week these markets reached new levels of hysteria as bad news came out of the US.

With HBOS shares in freefall, the next stage could have been a Northern Rock-style run on the bank. The Financial Services Authority took the extraordinary step of making two public statements saying that HBOS was secure, but the bank's shares kept falling..

The deal would make HBOS the third mortgage lender to surrender its independence this year. Northern Rock was nationalised in February while Alliance & Leicester shareholders voted on Tuesday to accept a buyout from Santander. A&L's management sold cheaply saying that the dangers of the credit crunch were too great.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/bu...sk-934226.html
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

The secret lies within
Reply With Quote
sponsor links
  #2  
Old 09-18-2008, 02:14 PM
loki loki is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,581
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
loki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of lightloki is a glorious beacon of light
Default

So now you have lloyds and TSB which merged in 1995 to create Lloyds TSB, who are now taking over HBOS, which is a result of the merger between Halifax and the Royal Bank Of Scotland, with another risk of losing 40,000 jobs. You also have the fact that all of the small shareholders having the value of their shares almost wiped out, while the larger investors pulled all of their money out further devaluing the shares:

Quote:
Before the deal panicking investors yesterday withdrew an estimated £1billion from the Halifax as fears over the safety of deposits grew.

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/61996
Where the hell is the monopolies commission, where will be the choice for us as savers in the future, when the crisis is over, where will the friendly (yeah like fuck) competition be for your custom as savers and investors be?

Why is this centrilasation of wealth allowed to go on?. Can you imagine wanting to open a bank account and only having the choice between two banks, what power those banks could weald?

Even the other banks are worried for the future, although to be fair its only probably for their own skins: http://www.rinf.com/forum/showthread...=5254#post5254

Last edited by loki; 09-18-2008 at 02:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


Breaking News | Conspiracy DVDs Cheap DVDs | SEO Tutorials | Debt help | Morecambe Hotels | Underground Internet Marketing