Satanic Ritual Abuse: Incest, Murder & Snuff Films

The following was published on the website of attorney Richard Hamlin, who is standing trial, charged with 18 felony counts of torture, spousal abuse, making death threats, negligent discharge of a handgun and child endangerment. News of his trial can be found at Satanic Ritual Abuse on Trial: Richard Hamlin Case) http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=36&contentid=3059

The type of incestuous abuse my ex-wife Susan Siemer Hamlin suffered is extremely complex.

Her father, Dr. Sidney R. Siemer, used a wide array of instruments to carry out his ritual incestuous abuse of Susan, her siblings and many other children of family and friends.

I have detailed previously on my site the horrific details of rape, torture, and abuse perpetrated by Dr. Siemer on his children, his grandchildren, and children of others.

Susan Siemer Hamlin has detailed acts of rape and child abuse that occurred throughout her life.

Some of those acts were committed in connection with satanic rituals. Overall, I would say that setting is a very small percentage of the incidents that she reported.

With that said, those incestuous acts of rape and abuse suffered during satanic rituals left a significant impact on Susan. Satanic ritual abuse was a tool that Dr. Siemer used to effectively continue his depraved criminal behavior.

My desire is to openly discuss this subset of incest and explain why so many incestuous families are so involved. Discussing this in this forum gives us the opportunity to understand this significant instrument that child molesters use to further their crimes and to avoid detection. This forum also eliminates the sensationalism that the mainstream press consistently applies to this subject.

SUSAN SIEMER HAMLIN’S CLAIMS

The following is what Susan either told me, told police, wrote in her diaries, or wrote in preparation of a book she wanted to write.

Susan’s first stated memory on this subject was recalling when she lived in Corvallis, Oregon in either the 3rd or 4th grade. That made it 1964/65. Her father, Dr. Siemer, picked her up early from school. He told her that they were going to have some “special time.”

As Susan began to recall this event, she would stare off into space, rarely making eye contact with me. It was as though she was reliving the event. She appeared to be somewhere else. She became excited and happy as she retold the initial time with her father.

Dr. Siemer took her to Dairy Queen and they got an ice cream. They then began to drive. They drove for about and hour. During the drive Susan Siemer had the father she always wanted. Dr. Siemer talked a lot. He asked her questions and as Susan stated, “made me feel important.”

What struck me was the glimpse I was getting into the twisted, sick, perverse mind of Sid Siemer. Dr. Siemer was playing the role of a caring father. He knew what she needed and gave her everything she normally was denied. This was to be a pattern that would continue to this day. Sidney Siemer would starve his children of love and basic affection. And then on calculated times he would tease them with an isolated display of love. He did this to keep them trying to please. Perform and maybe, just maybe, Susan would get the love she so craved. Don�t perform and receive his wrath.

Dr. Siemer was setting the trap for his prey.

As the hour ended and they had arrived, he abruptly changed. The old dad was back; mean, violent, and wanting things that Susan didn�t want to give. Susan described her change. She went from a happy, carefree little girl, to the cautious, quiet daughter readying herself for the next trauma.

She remembers her father changing from a loving dad to a stern taskmaster. He growled at her. “Do not embarrass me in front of my friends!” Susan specifically used the word growled as the phrase that best described his tone and sound when he would order her to “do things that she didn’t want to do.” She described entering a room with her father. He went to speak with two other men. Susan saw two boxes, both the same with what looked like “babies that had something wrong with them.” As she now remembered she realized that they were two fetuses. She also realized the boxes were ceremonial, used in satanic sacrificial ceremonies.

Dr. Sidney R. Siemer then asked his daughter, Susan Siemer, to “pick one of the babies.”

I asked Susan if she knew what was going on. She stated at the time she did know. She was picking a baby to be sacrificed. Susan was now sobbing and she told me that one of the “babies (fetus) looked worse, sicker, like it was already dead.” So with that knowledge she picked that baby.

I asked if she received praise if her father seemed happy with her. Her demeanor changed abruptly and she became very serious like a child would act. Susan stated that, “No,” she didn’t get praise. “That’s not the way it works. What I did was expected. So I was relieved that I did it right. I became quiet.”

She did ask one question in the car outside the presence of Sidney”s friends. She asked, “What happened to the other baby?” Dr. Sidney R. Siemer told his daughter, Susan Siemer, “It’s going to be a movie star.”

I asked what that meant. My wife calmly told me that, “It was going to be in a snuff film.”

By 4th grade, Susan Siemer had already seen a snuff film.

The father and daughter did not talk the rest of the way home.

The next memory that Susan recalled concerning satanic rituals also occurred in Corvallis, Oregon. She believes that this took place after the “baby picking” incident. Based on that, this would have occurred in 4th or 5th grade. The Siemers moved back to Fresno, California during Susan�s 6th grade year.

Dr. Siemer kept his daughter home on a Friday. Once again, he told Susan that this be “special time” between the two of them. The other kids had to go to school.

Dr. Siemer then explained to his daughter, Susan, that her mother was very sick because she had “a bad evil baby in her tummy.”

Susan stated that her mother was sleeping in her brother�s bed, downstairs. She described her mother as being “totally out of it. She looked dead.” As she remembered this she realized that her mother was clearly unconscious.

Susan said that she was terrified but remained “composed.” She stated that her father had that look. “This was no time to disagree or not do what I was supposed to do. I didn�t want to end up like my mom.”

Her defense was to concentrate on the tasks that Dr. Siemer told her to do and not look at her mother.

Dr. Siemer repeated the story that Susan’s mom had an “evil, sick baby in her tummy.” They were actually helping Mom, not hurting her and that her mother would want her to do this. Susan stated that Sidney Siemer told her, “Your mom will be proud of you for helping her get better.”

Susan remembers clearly parts of the home abortion. She remembers a lot of blood. Her father told her to collect the blood in “bronze tins.” She stated that the tins were ceremonial.

She was taught that Christians have silver goblets for their communion and that their church (Satanist) use bronze tins.

Always the exact same tins for the collecting of blood. Same size, same color. She related that during their services they would drink from those tins.

Susan remembers her dad using “potassium” during the “procedure.” Of note, her dad, Dr. Siemer, was at the time enrolled at Oregon State in the process of acquiring his PHD in bio-chemistry.

She did not remember or tell me that she remembered the actual delivery. Susan said that she remembers doing her job, concentrating on the blood, not making a mess. Then, the next thing she recalls is a baby. She now knows it was a fetus. She knew it was a baby boy.

The baby boy fetus was then placed in the same ceremonial box that she had seen before.

She next remembers driving to the home of George and Dora, where the ceremony was to take place the next day, Saturday. She had the box on her lap.

As Dr. Siemer drove his daughter, Susan, to deliver the fetus to be sacrificed, she continually said, “Not my baby brother, not my baby brother.”

This was the hardest part for me to witness. Up to this point, Susan clearly was in a state of �reliving� the event. As before, she was there at the event. She did not look at me while she recounted the event. But what was strange was that she was as she described, “very composed.” Eerily so.

When she got to the part of holding the box that held her “baby brother,” she was sitting on the floor, rocking back and forth slowly, acting as if she held the box. Tears began to stream down her face and she quietly repeated, “Not my baby brother.”

The next day the actual ceremony took place at George and Dora�s.

There are many more memories that Susan revealed about Satanism and ceremonies. She in fact went into great and specific details about how these ceremonies would take place, where, who, and which rituals were constantly played out time and time again. To protect our on going investigation and because much of these details will be revealed in the trial, I will not write about them at this time.

I wanted to give you a preview of the type of information that Susan has revealed and will become part of the public record shortly.

I will reprint two entries from Susan’s diaries that talked about what Dr. Siemer, her father, taught her about Satanism.

“Pureness for satanic purposes is a total knowing rejection of Christ.”

“I was taught that Christian principles were a reverse of Satan�s teachings. For example: Leviticus 18-21. We were taught to reflect Satan’s image (just as Christians reflect Christ’s image.)

Sid often spoke of “reflected light.”

Dr. Siemer taught Susan and his other children about the incestuous lifestyle. He justified it by making incest a part of a religion — Satanism.

He had a common theme; Satanist families that commit incest are different and not understood by society. Though there are many members of their belief, they were persecuted by a society controlled temporarily by the judgmental Christians. Dr. Siemer taught that Christians were bad people, that Christians were wrong.

A Siemer teaching was that Christians lied about, persecuted, and judged their sexual lifestyle. They were trying to deny pleasure. Their faith knew it was pleasurable but didn’t want people to know. They would then leave the Christian way and join the Satanist lifestyle.

The persecution theme was very useful in justifying the family being isolated and keeping the “secret” of what they did. It also supported the theme that they needed to continue to gain converts and acquire positions of power to end the need for their temporary secrecy.

The judgmental and lying themes supported the notion that incest was not only okay, but in actuality the better way to go. Susan stated that her father constantly preached this aspect. Perfection for Dr. Siemer was not only to force his children into this but to convince them that their incestuous lifestyle was their own choosing. Susan stated that he had a phrase, “Making it your own.” He wanted the children to enthusiastically partake in incest.

Siemer�s reality is that he wanted his children enthusiastically to have sex with him or those he told them to have sex with. After listening to do much of this from Susan, it seemed quite clear to me that Dr. Siemer wanted to create his own little incestuous kingdom when he reigned as “God.” It was as much about control and being able to it–as it was about the sexual pleasure.

Given what Susan has reported, one could conclude that Dr. Siemer was a true believer in the Devil and Satanism as a whole. I don�t know that to be true.

I believe that Dr. Siemer is a sick, pathetic, criminal that has used Satanism to further his criminal conduct. It seems that the good Dr. has plenty of company. Many of these child molesters use Satanism to accomplish crimes:

1) Justification
2) Enforcement
3) Concealment

JUSTIFICATION

Dr. Siemer actively presented “Satanism” as a viable option and alternative to Christianity and or the social norm.

In many instances, the satanic rituals and teachings were very formal, official, and laced with historical and logical arguments that supported its viability.

As Susan recounted, Satanism was the “mirror opposite” of Christianity.

But as such, Satanism had its own formalities, procedures, rules, and “rituals.”

Christians have a bible and church services. Satanists have their own “holy book and documents” that followers learn from. Satanists have their own “church” where they have their own ritual ceremonies.

Dr. Siemer presented their cult as a viable alternative to what �some� believed in. He would impress upon the children that there were many believers in Satanism. He stressed that they were special. They were free from the guilt and judgment of those “Jesus freaks.”

And that of course leads us to the real reason Dr. Siemer so endorses Satanism and participates in a cult. Because as a member of this special church, Dr. Siemer gets to have sex with his children and other member’s children. He taught his own daughter that sex between them was special and true love. Others either didn’t understand them or were woefully brainwashed by those judgmental Christians.

The teachings went further. Sex was all good. Every last bit of it. Everything about sex felt good and should be experienced. Thus, sex with family members, strangers, animals, etcetera, was all okay. Dr. Siemer actually argued, “It feels good, doesn’t it?� If you had sex with another for money, it’s okay. Sex with a sibling, it’s okay. But most of all, the most special sex was always with Dad.

Dr. Siemer and others like him are using Satanism to justify their incestuous sex and child rape.

For a minute, walk in the victim�s shoes. Your Dad, your one and only father is teaching you that this is all okay. Not just okay but the best thing for you. The man that you love and want to love you. The man that you want acceptance from and want to impress. He is teaching you that this is a norm.

The young victim is born with a desire to trust their dad. And in these cases Dad is talking about something that just seems to be a “different religion.” It’s formal. It seems to make sense and just remember�it�s Dad telling you this. It must be all right.

Justification for incest.

ENFORCEMENT

Dr. Siemer and many others have found that Satanism is a great way to keep their victims quiet. Dr. Siemer used mind control through the deliberate introduction of trauma to further his criminal activity and continue to avoid detection.

Dr. Siemer learned that if you create enough trauma in an incident with a child, that as a defense mechanism the child splits off and creates a separate personality. The trauma is simply too much for the child to endure.

The mind therefore resorts to creating a different personality that deals with the trauma. The cruel irony is that the very thing that defends the child also protects the perpetrator. The child has no memory of the incident. That allows the child to survive and the child molester to avoid detection.

Children cannot be expected to keep everything quiet on their own, so this becomes a horrific tool to ensure their silence.

As children grow, the hope of pedophiles like Dr. Siemer is that the justification takes hold and their children will actually make the incestuous lifestyle their own. Still, the secret must remain intact.

Thus either as a deliberate method of inducing trauma or as part of the indoctrination to the cult, victims are taught about the dark side of the cult. For all of the permission the Devil gives when it comes down to sex, there are several things old Satan doesn’t like. First and foremost is anyone outside the church or cult to learn of their activities. And as Christ so commands his followers, the Devil does the same. Her dad would often allude to the judgmental Christians trying to persecute them if they ever found out about what went on.

All of the justification aside, what was taught and displayed during satanic ceremonies was that Satan was not to be crossed. Silence was ordered. No questions asked. The penalty was spiritual retribution. Not in the hereafter but now.

If it wasn’t enough that Dad threatened to kill you if you talked about what went on during these ceremonies and in your life, now the victim had to really worry about demonic forces and agents of Satan attacking if one revealed the secret.

As bizarre as this may seem to one not so involved, just place yourself in the shoes of the victim. That is all they have known. They have been to satanic ceremonies where babies have been sacrificed. They have seen snuff films. Death is a reality.

Worse yet, these victims have seen that living can be worse than death. Their reality is that their lives are far worse than the finality of death. Victims of ritual abuse attempt to manage their lives in terms of the lesser of two evils. As bad as one choice is, failing to follow the rules guarantees a much worse fate.

The bottom line is the real fear that comes from participation in a cult. That fear is used by people like Dr. Siemer to enforce silence in their victims. Another enforcement tool is compromising of an individual who has participated in a ritual.

Susan described having to participate in the sacrifice of babies. She made “the selection” of which infant would be used in ritual. Other victims have described being forced to hold a knife that is used to kill a baby. The father would guide the child�s hand that holds the knife.

Such acts draw the victim into a set of circumstances where they believe that they are part of the criminal conduct. Of course the perpetrators will continually reinforce that notion. It is not uncommon for the perpetrator to taunt the victim with their participation. “Go to the police and tell them what? That you killed a baby? You will go to prison for the rest of your life.”

Enforcement for incest.

CONCEALMENT

Satanism is being used to cause others to disbelieve the victim�s claims.

The child rapist’s ready ally is our mainstream press. The minute the word Satanism or the Devil comes out, the press ignores the criminal charge and focuses in a very disbelieving way on the Devil aspect of the story. It is as if those words automatically cause the press, many of the law enforcement branches, and the general public to disqualify the underlining claims. It is as though our collective fear of a cult�s existence causes a Pavlovian response of disbelief.

There is a growing body of study that many intelligent child rapists understand this precisely. Studies have revealed that some child molesters have participated in satanic rituals simply to create an unbelievable set of circumstances if the victim tells.

Instead of police officers or news reporter asking and investigating into the victim’s claims of being raped and molested, the inquiry is directed at the unbelievable satanic aspect.”

It is time for us as a society to realize the tricks and methods of those criminals that pursue their depravity through incestuous sex. They are banking on one thing — you will not believe the victim.

CONCLUSION

Remember, the main issue is incest.

What we have today are ordinary criminals doing whatever it takes to continue their criminal conduct. Simply put, they want to get away with it.

The introduction of Satanism by child rapists and molesters serves a real purpose in achieving their goal of getting away with it.

We need to ignore the hysteria when the word Satanism is raised and investigate into the underlying issues and crimes that exist.

RICHARD HAMLIN

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED
http://www.geocities.com/richardwhamlin/incestandsatanism