Green Party: majority support for new 911 probe

Ian Henshall

The good news is the Green Party Conference had majority support for a motion to support the US Greens call for a new independent and extended inquiry into 911, the bad news is it needed a 2/3 majority and fell just short. There are some pretty horrible stalinist types there who seem pretty indistinguishable from the Labour left.

There is definitely big potential from the UK Greens but they are unbelieveably badly organised, we need to get one or two of their many 911 truth seekers to get us into the policy process, it shouldn’t be too hard. Most of the people who supported us are true 911 sceptics but some are official story believers who just like the idea of an enquiry to embarass the Bush White House. The only chance of getting a majority was by stressing that Greens are just making a legitimate demand for an enquiry.

Many Greens see David Icke as the worst disaster that ever befell them. Some have been galvanised by David Shayler’s alleged comments at BGG and are currently campaigning against the 911 truth movement, citing David’s speculations as just where they don’t want to go.

Here is the press release I put out in case you did not see it.

Greens in UK support call for new 911 inquiry.

A large majority at the Green party conference, meeting in Hove, UK, voted today to support the US Green’s call for a “new, independent and expanded” inquiry into the 911 attacks. However the emergency motion failed on a technicality to become official policy: in a cliffhanger vote the motion failed by two votes to achieve a two thirds majority.

The alleged mortal threat from Al Qaeda has drastically set back the agenda of practically everything Greens believe in, said the motion’s supporters.

Many Green candidates across the US and some in the UK are planning to run on a “911 Truth” platform at upcoming elections, appealing directly to disenfranchised voters who doubt the offical 911 legend. According to recent opinion polls around one in three Americans believe that elements within the US either authored or at least consciously allowed the 911 attacks to succeed.

London Assembly representative Darren Johnson summed up the minority view, saying afterwards that he was concerned that support for a new inquiry would lend weight to “conspiracy theories”. Others cited “off the wall” speculations from 911 sceptic and one time MI5 officer David Shayler at the recent Big Green Gathering as a reason to oppose the call for a new enquiry.

However supporters of the motion argued that public doubts about the 911 legend were not the only reason to reopen the inquiry. Even if the official 911 story is broadly true, they said, it was now widely accepted the Bush White House lied in stating there were no warnings of the 911 attacks and had puffed up the threat from Bin Laden to cover up its incompetence and justify the war agenda it was intent on even before the attacks occurred.

Note:

This release is written by Ian Henshall who was present as an observer at
the conference. Ian Henshall is co-author of 911 Revealed, which in the
words of expert Nick Fielding writing in the London Sunday Times uncovered
“vast gaps” in the official 911 story and called for an expanded enquiry.

The official 911 Commission is now widely discredited in Washington after
the Able Danger scandal when Pentagon whistleblowers said they identified
alleged hijacker Mohammed Atta months before the attacks. They told a
congressional committee the Commission must have deliberately ignored their
testimony when it stated in it’s report that Atta was unknown to any US
agency. In addition to Able Danger, Commission chair Thomas Kean has written
recently that although there was no mention of it in the Commission’s
report, officials at the Pentagon repeatedly and consciously lied and
commissioners were only prevented by political considerations from pressing
criminal charges.

911 sceptics have been boosted by recently published tapes from the Pentagon
showing that, as alleged for some time, the Pentagon was indeed conducting a
major anti-hijacking exercise on the morning of the 911 attacks. This
exercise is a suspicious coincidence too far, they say.

—————————————————————————-
————————————
All comment is written in a strictly personal capacity.
From Ian Henshall, co-author 911 Revealed, publisher of Crisis Newsletter
and www.911dossier.co.uk. He is also proprietor of Coffee Plant
(www.coffee.uk.com) and chair of INK, the trade organisation for the UK
alternative print media (www.ink.uk.com).
—————————–