Globalisationists seek to expedite “the cleansing” in Iran, Iraq, and elsewhere

Globalisationists are currently seeking to pursue an all-out nuclear war on the pretext of Iran, in order to expedite their sought “cleansing” of the world from “inferior races”. This seems a little ‘crazy’, until one begins to appreciate the psychoanalytical prism of “Globalisationists”. Humanity can either choose to save itself from these “Globalisationists” or face extinction of the species by this fanatical pursuit.

What is Globalization?

“Globalization” is a mantra created by “neo-conservatives”. Publicly, Globalization is about the spreading of “freedom” , “democracy”, and “prosperity” through the internationalization of ‘market reforms’. However, in order to understand the substance of what Globalization is all about, one needs to appreciate its neo-conservative ideology.

The facade of “Christianity” and “Patriotism”

U.S. “neo-conservatives” present themselves as great “patriots” of America, as well as “Christians”, as they wrap themselves in the American Flag, and regularly attend Church ceremonies.

Neo-conservatism is a well-financed and prevailing prism of American political leadership

Importantly, for Americans, and for other peoples effected by the United States, a neo-conservative doctrine drives American domestic and economic policy, and constitutes the substantive prism of American political leadership.

The political theatre of American neo-conservatism

However, the neo-conservative presentation of themselves as “patriotic” and as being led by “Christians” is political theatre. Indeed, if in fact, neo-conservatism was inspired by the spirit of the Bible, and “patriotism”, America would be a totally different place today.

Patriotism is concerned with protecting the well-being and welfare of all members of a society in association with the pursuit of quality-of-living attainments. The spirit of the Bible in association with other religious texts, embraces values which axiomatically pivots on human rights; social justice, including championing and poor, against the oppressed; and also a world of peace.

Patriotism is not based upon creating myths designed to artificially unify a society, based upon deceit and spreading fear at home, and abroad. Christianity similarly, does not advocate the pursuit of material wealth like oil, ensuing pre-emptive military strikes and “shock and awe” bombardments, that mutilate, and kill innocent civilians; and the oppression of the poor in order to maintain materialistic power. Unfortunately, this is the prism from which neo-conservatism operates.

A critical appreciation of neo-conservatism reveals its ideology is not patriotic, but instead, traitorous against the inherently historically progressive spirit of America. Furthermore, it is apparent that neo-conservatives are not the political disciples of Jesus. Nor do they pursue a platform of “democracy”. Rather, it is apparent that they are the incarnation of a sort of “anti-Christ”, that the Bible warns humanity, in references that include assailing “wolves in sheep’s clothing”.

If American political leaders had actually been guided by patriotism and the spirit of the Bible

If America had a prevailing leadership which was correspondingly guided by both patriotism and Christianity, such a leadership, for example, would ensure that every American would have access to public healthcare irrespective of personal access to financial resources. After all, Jesus healed the sick without seeking to gain financially, as others of his day also had sought. American political leaders would create policy aimed at the eradicating poverty, and fostering a nurturing society based upon a spirituality for peace and lovingkindness. Such a progressive America was a part of the vision of, for example, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Martin Luther King Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy.

Such an American political leadership would inspire an aggressive human rights, social justice, pro-peace, and environmental policy agenda. America’s environmental policy agenda would seek to safeguard Americans, and the planet in general, from its current course of environmental destruction. Such an American political leadership would seek to protect America’s natural heritage from its forests, waterways, air, and other environmental features as a sacred creation of G-d, that nurtures life in spirit and through sustenance. Such an American political leadership would have been the leading champion of the Kyoto Protocol, urging all countries to endorse it.

Globalisationists seek Lebensraum

The public expression of Globalization is the political theatric context, designed to be used by mass-media for public relations. However, for the neo-conservatives, Globalization is substantively about the creation of what the German Nazis under Adolf Hitler, used to call “Lebensraum” or “Living Space”. Globalization accordingly, is the creation of ‘Living Space” for the “rich” ideologues who see themselves as a “superior” type of entity.

The world-view of Neo-conservative Globalisationists

In the view of neo-conservative movement of “Globlisationists”, people are poor because they are “inferior”, and people are rich, because they are “by definition” “superior”. Within this “world-view” neo-conservatives view America specifically, and the world in general, as being “over-populated” by too many “inferior races”. These “inferior races” go beyond the “niggers”, “chinks”, “pakis”, “hispanics”, and the other coloured races. “Inferior races” to neo-conservatives also include whites who are poor, or “weak-minded” “liberals”, in their embracing of “sentimental” values such as peace, human rights, and lovingkindness.

American-led Globalisationists seek a “New World Order”

Neo-conservatives believe that the world needs to be “re-born” under their leadership, often referred to as the “New World Order”. Neo-conservative champion Globalization not to facilitate “freedom”, broad “prosperity” and democracy”, as expressed in mass-propaganda. Neo-conservatives champion “Globalization” in order to achieve their sought “New World Order” where “inferior races” have been defeated.

Globalization is a means to achieve the necessary power by elites, to be able to strategically facilitate a “New World Order”. However, neo-conservative believe that Globalization is only a complement to what can be referred as “the cleansing”, that they seek. The cleansing refers to a process in which ‘the world’ is rid of so many “inferior races”, that deprive superior races from access to scare and “precious” resources.

Neo-conservative endorse “cleansing” through “de-population”

Neo-conservatives thus unofficially endorse “de-population” of resource rich areas, which are assisted with limiting U.S. responses to famines, diseases, and other disasters, which the majority of Americans, in the spirit of “liberal” generosity, and neighbourliness, would like to redress.

Social Darwinism in neo-conservatism

Neo-conservative “Globalisationists” are basically ’social Darwinists’ who view that a “strong society” can only be created under an “invigorating” and “maturing” “survival of the fittest” context. Within this context the poor should not be helped, because that helping only nurtures “inferior races”. This prism also correspondingly views that “bad things happen to bad people”. Therefore, in the apparent view of neo-conservatives, the refugees created by Hurricane Katrina were simply again a “bad thing” happening to “bad people” (by providence of their “Aryan gods”), and who also happened to be “inferior races”. The ritualized and disingenuous response to the victims of Katrina, as well as the ignoring of the plight of the poor in America, to ‘neocons’ simply boils down to not interfering with “bad things happening to bad people”.

In the American neo-conservative prism, (for example), that has inspired the American private healthcare system, people who can’t pay for healthcare “should be left to perish”, because people who don’t have money are “inferior”. In the American neo-conservative prism, the millions of Americans who are without healthcare, and those who become sick, and perish, are simply a bunch of “inferior races”.

Americans who are “strong” and “virile” are descendants of “good racial stock” who have the financial resources “to take care of themselves”.

In the neo-conservative prism, the senseless bombing of innocent Iraqis and Afghanistanis, that is creating civil war conditions in the Middle East is “great”, because it involves “inferior races” annihilating one another, and that frees more sources for “the rich”.

American foreign policy did not seek to prevent genocide in Rwanda, just as it now ignores genocide in Sudan, because neo-conservatives view the Africans also to be “inferior races”. The prism of neo-conservatives also views AIDS in Africa and throughout the world as “bad things happening to bad people”. That’s why the U.S. neo-conservative led response to AIDS is as ritualized as other U.S. neo-conservative reactions to the need for humanitarian initiatives.

In the prism of American neo-conservatism, America was created and developed as a Superpower, from the spreading of a “virile” race of people, who crossed the Atlantic, and defeated the racially “primitive Indians”. Through Globalization, American neo-conservatives seek to facilitate the continued “Manifest Density” of America, against the whole world. Neo-conservatives view the Muslims in Iraq and Iran as representing a modern day “Indian problem”, whose “territories”, should be subjugated by the “superior races”.

Violence “is good” in America because its brings with it cheap labour and strengthens American “virility” in “a violent world”

Most Americans deplore crime. Neo-conservatives also don’t particularly like crime, but view it to have “dividends”. Neo-conservatives are thus opportunists in the most crass and exploitative “modus operandi’ of American-led “global capitalism”. One such dividend for neo-conservatives, is that crime creates a “captive cheap labour pool” of “obviously inferior races” in America’s prison system. Indeed, America’s largest corporations now embrace the “benefits” of crime and prison labour for facilitating their insatiable pursuit of “profit”. American prison labour is “like having a sweatshop without having to move operations into Thailand”, or some other “Third World” country, or “developing markets” like Communist China. Another market “dividend” about crime in America for neo-conservatives is that violence in America “breeds” a better solider, and police officer. These better soldiers, having been exposed to violence in their daily lives, will then be better able to defend an “America of virile races” from weak “inferior races”, in the ‘homeland’, and in places like Iraq, and in the Middle East. Redressing crime through affirming a context of social justice that moves communities away from a culture for violence, would only help out “inferior races” and make America a less “virile” society.

The hideous intelligence of Leo Strauss

What are the origins of the ‘hideous intelligence’ associated with the American neo-conservatism that has spread into prevailing American political thinking? Leo Strauss is the founder of American neo-conservatism, that in turn inspired “Globalization”, and the current “War on Terrorism”, that currently threatens all-out nuclear War.

Leo Strauss was born in 1899. He was a German of Jewish background. He emigrated to the United States to flee a milieu of Anti-Semitism associated with the rise of the Hitler’s Nazis. The great majority of people who fled to the United States from Nazi Germany, hated Nazis with a passion, and were inspired by what they viewed to be a progressive America that welcomed them. However, Strauss was not one of these anti-Nazi emigrants. Strauss wrote in a letter in May 1933, five months after Hilter’s appointment as Chancellor and a month after the implementation of the first anti-Jewish legislation, that “Just because Germany has turned to the right and expelled us,” meaning Jews, “it simply does not follow that the principles of the right are therefore to be rejected.” Strauss sought to re-create a form of Nazism, which was stripped of its anti-Semitism. Strauss was able to attract American academic, militaristic, and industrial interests, who were infatuated with Nazi trappings of “wealth” and of absolute power.

Leo Strauss emulates the characters of a Star Trek episode

Strauss is reminiscent of characters in a 1960’s episode of Star Trek entitled ‘Patterns of Force’. In that episode, the John Gill character goes to an alien planet. He indicated to the character Captain Kirk of the Starship Enterprise that “the populace had fragmented, and that he thought he could pattern them after the most efficient state in history…”. Another character called Melakon, seized power from Gill, and began a rampage, which descended into an emulated Nazi state.

Strauss spreads his Neo-Hilterian philosophies from within the University of Chicago, and throughout the American Establishment

Strauss was hired by the University of Chicago in 1949, where he began to teach political philosophy. At Chicago he begins to have students, schooling them in his techniques of writing, and world-view in general.

Nicholas Xenos who wrote critically about the dystopianism of Leo Strauss, cites that once in the political science department, Strauss attacked social science for its “value neutrality”, and for the affinity of social science to “liberal-democratic” values in America.

His students and other disciples went on to become the leaders of the prevailing American neo-conservative Establishment, who are well supported by and are also ensconced in the megalomania of a military-industrial complex.

Nicholas Xenos further elaborates that “Straussians were often ridiculed for their cult-like qualities.” Xenos further elaborates that, “they speak and write the same way; they write the same books on the same themes over and over again; they dress alike; they are almost all men; they went to the same schools — those sorts of things.”

In other words, the ascendance of neo-conservatives in the American political economic Establishment represent a take-over by admirers and followers of a form of neo-Nazism. This neo-Nazism represents a form of cult-oriented ideological “cancer” against the spirit of America as a “nation of immigrants”. Neocons appear to seek administrative strategies which will support their apparent collective desire to re-direct the prevailing value priorities of American society, toward their sought “New World Order”, under their direction.

Straussianism in the War on Terrorism

Leo Strauss was a great admirer of Adolf Hitlerian Nazi techniques, such as the ‘Big Lie’, and of myth-making in general. This is because in his view, his sought “unity of society” relied on the creation of religious-inspired ‘myths’ against a “common enemy”, as in the Straussian concocted “War on Terrorism”. Leo Strauss was a great admirer of proto-Nazi philosophers like Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, and Carl Schmitt, along with a type of Nazi pseudo-religious ideology.

Strauss had been actively involved in pro-fascist German youth groups, which become the milieu for the spread of Nazi imperial militarism. This is the same kind of militaristic ideology, which the Straussians have sought to incorporate into their concoted “War on Terrorism”.

Straussian critiques of “American liberalism”

Neo-conservative criticism against “liberals” in the U.S. media, are Straussian in origins. The U.S. mass-media has given a misleading impression to Americans that this critique is against the irresponsible “spend-thrift” ways of ‘liberals’. This neo-conservative criticism is actually an attack against the Straussian perception of an America that has become “permissive” and “weakened” by inferior and “multi-cultural hordes”. Abhorred “liberal policies” are those initiatives which seek, for example, to promote human rights, social justice, peace in places that include the “inferior races” forum of the United Nations; and the environment.

Straussians seek to hasten “the cleansing” in the Middle East and elsewhere

The self-professed “Christians” and “patriots” who now threaten a nuclear war are really “Straussians” who embrace a Cult of Mammon. The Americans who defensively fought against the prospects of a world conquest by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Germany ‘Third Reich’ have been apparently betrayed by a Straussian cabal that seeks to use Nazism to destroy America from within, like an invasive Trojan Horse (and also the world in general, via its drunken pursuit of world conquest).

In their pursuit of “Lebensraum” through Globalization, Straussian neo-conservative “Globalisationists” apparently believe that, if an all-out nuclear war erupts from nuclear strikes in Iran, (and other parts of the world if necessary) then so be it. After all, waiting for the onslaught of famines, diseases like AIDS, and Global Warming to rid the planet of “inferior races” in the view of Straussians, in “taking too long.” Why not seek a “nuclear show down” in Iran, that defeats “inferior races” that “over-populate” the Earth “once and for all?

In the deranged psychosis and total madness of Straussian Globalisationists, the “superior race” with resources promises to “survive and multiply”, and the remainder “inferior races” which have not been militarily “cleansed” will have to serve the will of a U.S. elite led “New World Order”. And even if no one survives, which is unlikely, because of the existence of a “superior race”, what is important is that America would have stopped “wasting” its nuclear stockpiles, and would have put it to “good use” by destroying the “vermin” of “inferior races”, in a “spectacular” “nuclear blaze of glory”. In the process, “superior Americanophile races” will be judged well by the “Aryan Sun gods”, who will be satisfied with having the “inferior races” further cleansed from the Earth.

Copyright © 2005 The Canadian. All rights reserved.