<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The US Missile Defence System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/war-terrorism/the-us-missile-defence-system/4419/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/war-terrorism/the-us-missile-defence-system/4419/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8949</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximus</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/war-terrorism/the-us-missile-defence-system/4419/#comment-122827</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/?p=4419#comment-122827</guid>
		<description>There is a proven defence against missile attack without spending Billions on useless junk -  peaceful diplomacy and peaceful coexistence.


Russia did not attack Georgia until it murdered Russians in South Ossetia Right?   So if Nazi NATO don&#039;t threaten or harm Russians then they will not threaten or harm Americans.

However, seeing as America is an international Criminal state who constantly interferes all over the world in other people&#039;s business (Constantly been at war since the second world war ended) is it any wonder Russia is nervous?

Forget about missiles, Russia has a radar system whereby once a target is locked on by guidance radar, a secondary radar focuses a narrow path onto the target, then a beam of high energy particles is sent to follow the guidance beam (path of least resistance) causing missile destruction in 3 ways.

1 : Guidance system is fried.

2 : External communication with missile is lost.

3 : The newer systems can cause Nuclear detonation in older munitions due to effecting critical Neutron concentration.


Why do you suppose Russia virtually scrapped its old nuclear subs - because its got something much safer, more reliable, far less expensive and does not depend solely upon mutual destruction if attacked.


And  if anyone thinks having Nuclear weapons keeps them safe, think about this:  the Russian system is over the horizon capable, due to the ionosphere being as it is, so if missiles are fired from Poland, (close proximity) they will be detected almost immediately and are closest to the guidance beam and following particle beam, hence the chances of blowing the missiles up as they accelerate to full speed is that much easier due to the close proximity and lower missile speeds.

Any attack from Poland would render Poland totally destroyed, yet it would be Washington making the decision.

If Poland values its health it should withdraw from the useless missile agreement and sign a friendship packed with all concerned.

Look, there is no way anyone is going to stop the thousands of Russian tanks anyway, so having a good neighbour policy makes a lot more sense than placing missiles which don&#039;t even work except 20% of the time and even then if they are not highly reflective.

Mutual respect and peaceful intent is what will work, not 80% useless American junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a proven defence against missile attack without spending Billions on useless junk &#8211;  peaceful diplomacy and peaceful coexistence.</p>
<p>Russia did not attack Georgia until it murdered Russians in South Ossetia Right?   So if Nazi NATO don&#8217;t threaten or harm Russians then they will not threaten or harm Americans.</p>
<p>However, seeing as America is an international Criminal state who constantly interferes all over the world in other people&#8217;s business (Constantly been at <a href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/category/war-terrorism/" >war</a> since the second world war ended) is it any wonder Russia is nervous?</p>
<p>Forget about missiles, Russia has a radar system whereby once a target is locked on by guidance radar, a secondary radar focuses a narrow path onto the target, then a beam of high energy particles is sent to follow the guidance beam (path of least resistance) causing missile destruction in 3 ways.</p>
<p>1 : Guidance system is fried.</p>
<p>2 : External communication with missile is lost.</p>
<p>3 : The newer systems can cause Nuclear detonation in older munitions due to effecting critical Neutron concentration.</p>
<p>Why do you suppose Russia virtually scrapped its old nuclear subs &#8211; because its got something much safer, more reliable, far less expensive and does not depend solely upon mutual destruction if attacked.</p>
<p>And  if anyone thinks having Nuclear weapons keeps them safe, think about this:  the Russian system is over the horizon capable, due to the ionosphere being as it is, so if missiles are fired from Poland, (close proximity) they will be detected almost immediately and are closest to the guidance beam and following particle beam, hence the chances of blowing the missiles up as they accelerate to full speed is that much easier due to the close proximity and lower missile speeds.</p>
<p>Any attack from Poland would render Poland totally destroyed, yet it would be Washington making the decision.</p>
<p>If Poland values its health it should withdraw from the useless missile agreement and sign a friendship packed with all concerned.</p>
<p>Look, there is no way anyone is going to stop the thousands of Russian tanks anyway, so having a good neighbour policy makes a lot more sense than placing missiles which don&#8217;t even work except 20% of the time and even then if they are not highly reflective.</p>
<p>Mutual respect and peaceful intent is what will work, not 80% useless American junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/war-terrorism/the-us-missile-defence-system/4419/#comment-122241</link>
		<dc:creator>V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/?p=4419#comment-122241</guid>
		<description>Redjade, if you press on the link which says &quot;The Guardian&quot; it goes to the original article. 
 
If you need help understanding the article perhaps you should consider reading the BENO? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redjade, if you press on the link which says &quot;The Guardian&quot; it goes to the original article.</p>
<p>If you need help understanding the article perhaps you should consider reading the BENO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Meaney</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/war-terrorism/the-us-missile-defence-system/4419/#comment-122154</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Meaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/?p=4419#comment-122154</guid>
		<description>Monbiot writes for the Guardian, the Guardian is given as the source for this article and links to his original post. Nothing is being hidden. 
 
Or maybe it&#039;s a plot between myself and the Illuminati?!? 
  
You paranoid types are starting to grate on me now. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monbiot writes for the Guardian, the Guardian is given as the source for this article and links to his original post. Nothing is being hidden.</p>
<p>Or maybe it&#039;s a plot between myself and the Illuminati?!?</p>
<p>You paranoid types are starting to grate on me now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redjade</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/war-terrorism/the-us-missile-defence-system/4419/#comment-121881</link>
		<dc:creator>redjade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/?p=4419#comment-121881</guid>
		<description>This article is by George Monbiot.

Why would you hide this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is by George Monbiot.</p>
<p>Why would you hide this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

