Irish politicians back calls for universal arms trade treaty

September 17, 2008 1

Politicians from all the main parties have given their support to a global campaign to ban the sale of arms to conflict zones such as Darfur and Burma, where they are likely to be used for violations of human rights.

Launching a report which details the catastrophic effect of unrestrained arms trading on human rights in conflict zones, Amnesty International said 56 TDs, senators and MEPs had signed a parliamentary declaration supporting a comprehensive Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).

These signatures will be added to those of 1,600 parliamentarians across the world who have signed the same declaration, and will be handed over to the United Nations, where a universal treaty is due to be discussed next month.

“The absence of a common binding standard on international trade in weapons has resulted in the widespread abuse of human rights in the form of rape, murder and violence,” said Noeleen Hartigan of Amnesty’s Irish section.

“The Irish Government has to date been a strong advocate for a comprehensive arms trade treaty. In the face of opposition from powerful states like the USA, China, India and Russia, Ireland must support the use of a human rights criterion as the basis for negotiations for a universal arms trade treaty.”

According to Amnesty’s report, Blood at the Crossroads , large quantities of arms are making their way to Iraq despite human rights violations by all parties in the conflict there, and there is a lack of monitoring by the Iraq, US and UK governments over where the weapons end up.

It also states that China and Russia remain the largest suppliers of conventional arms to Sudan, while in Burma, despite persistent human rights violations committed by government forces, China, Serbia, Russia and Ukraine have supplied armoured personnel carriers, trucks, weapons and munitions.

“The time for an arms trade treaty is now. Sixty years after the signing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the same governments can and should deliver an effective agreement on international arms transfers with human rights at its heart,” Ms Hartigan said.

© 2008 irishtimes.com

  • http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2008/09/17-6 ajit8

    Published on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 by One World.net
    Worldwide, Civilians Demand Arms Trade Treaty

    by Haider Rizvi

    UNITED NATIONS – Driven by concerns over the continued loss of civilian lives in armed conflicts, a coalition of rights groups and aid organizations is calling for a worldwide crackdown on the illegal trade in guns.

    In kicking off its week-long campaign last weekend, the coalition known as the Control Arms Campaign said its activists would hold public meetings and events around the world to urge governments to endorse the proposed United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

    Diplomatic negotiations on the proposal to create an effective arms control treaty are scheduled to take place during a General Assembly meeting on disarmament and security early next month.

    Studies show that at least a third of a million people are killed every year with conventional weapons, many of which are used by human rights abusers due to the poorly regulated international arms market.

    The United Nations says “small arms” include assault rifles, pistols, sub-machine guns, light machine guns, mortars, portable anti-aircraft guns, grenade launchers, anti-tank missile and rocket systems, hand grenades, and anti-personnel landmines.

    The London-based rights watchdog Amnesty International said this week’s events to promote an arms trade treaty include football matches in Mali, a street march in Tanzania, a film screening in Edinburgh, a parade in Mongolia, and a stunt outside the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Spain.

    The week-long campaign coincides with the sixtieth anniversary of the UN Declaration of Human Rights as well as the release of a new Amnesty report on rights abuses entitled “Blood at the Crossroads: Making the case for a global arms trade treaty.”

    In recent years, a vast majority of UN member states have expressed interest in creating the treaty to tighten arms control, but the United States and some other major arms manufacturers and suppliers have continued to say no.

    The United States is estimated to have an over 35-percent share in the global market of light weapons.

    This year, the UN held several meetings on the treaty proposal, which were attended by a number of government officials from dozens of member countries. Observers say that discussions leading to the negotiation of the treaty could continue into 2009.

    The proposal to create such a treaty was first adopted by the General Assembly in 2006 after more than 150 countries voted in its favor, 24 abstained, and one — the United States — opposed.

    Civilians, Generals Support ‘Turning Off the Tap’

    Gun control campaigners say last year they gathered more than 1 million signatures on a petition supporting a global treaty to regulate the arms trade. A number of former UN military commanders also signed the petition.

    “It is very significant that these generals are supporting the treaty,” said Jeremy Hobbs, director of Oxfam International, an international aid group that is part of the Control Arms Campaign.

    Oxfam and other groups contend that the proposed treaty would help prevent small weapons transfers if they are used, or likely to be used, in violation of international human rights law.

    “It’s about people. It’s about their struggle for life,” says Janine di Giovanni, a well-known European war reporter who has covered various bloody conflicts around the world for well over 20 years. “These weapons destroy entire societies.”

    According to UN and Oxfam researchers, in 2005, small arms alone were responsible for the deaths of over half a million people — 10,000 per week on average.

    The former UN military commanders who support the arms control campaigners hold that strict and comprehensive international rules against the illegal gun business is a must to save innocent lives.

    In a past statement, Patrick Commaert, who has led UN forces in several parts of the world, said that even as his troops were disarming warring parties, he knew the flow of weapons would not stop.

    “It was like you are mopping the floor, but the tap is on,” he said

    Illicit Trade No Small Concern Either

    Currently, about 25 percent of the $4 billion annual trade in small arms is either illicit or not recorded, according to the Small Arms Survey, an independent research project at the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva, Switzerland.

    Research shows that arms dealers in several African countries continue to violate embargoes — whether imposed by the United Nations or the United States — by using false documents or bogus certificates.

    Such violations, according to the United Nations, are mostly carried out by middlemen involved in the illicit brokering of small arms. Most of them are operating in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Angola, Liberia, Somalia, Sudan, and Cote d’Ivoire.

    But, as many independent experts have noted, these middle men are able to operate on such a large scale only because they have the tacit support of certain powerful governments and arms manufacturers.

    “This trade is very lucrative,” said Dr. B. S. Malik, former chief of staff of the Indian army’s western command, in an interview with OneWorld last year. “The industry makes money out of peoples’ difficulties.”

    In Malik’s view, many governments are still more interested in their defense needs while the industry cares only about economic gains.

    The Control Arms Campaigners hope their efforts this week will help ensure the views of another interest group are heard in the negotiations over whether or not to regulate the sale of weapons: innocent civilians.