<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FBI wants widespread monitoring of &#8216;illegal&#8217; web activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/fbi-wants-widespread-monitoring-of-illegal-web-activity/3172/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/fbi-wants-widespread-monitoring-of-illegal-web-activity/3172/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=5282</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: steve k</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/fbi-wants-widespread-monitoring-of-illegal-web-activity/3172/#comment-35809</link>
		<dc:creator>steve k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/fbi-wants-widespread-monitoring-of-illegal-web-activity/3172/#comment-35809</guid>
		<description>Yes in principle this sounds ok such as cutting cybercrime and tackling those that would exploit children , this i agree is a good thing . Saying that its further down the line that i have concerns about , the article mentioned the fact that this would be targeted at criminals , but we already know that in the U.K. that PEACE CAMPAIGNERS and other PEACEFULL ACTIVISTS can be arrested under the ANTI-TERROISM LAWS so will this new legislation apply to those people too . I am not saying that it will but the oppertunity for governments to use this application that way is there , so will they be able to restrict themselves too REAL CRIME or will they turn their attention to anyone that simply just want too stand up for others HUMAN RIGHTS . I guess only time will tell . </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes in principle this sounds ok such as cutting cybercrime and tackling those that would exploit children , this i agree is a good thing . Saying that its further down the line that i have concerns about , the article mentioned the fact that this would be targeted at criminals , but we already know that in the U.K. that PEACE CAMPAIGNERS and other PEACEFULL ACTIVISTS can be arrested under the ANTI-TERROISM LAWS so will this new legislation apply to those people too . I am not saying that it will but the oppertunity for governments to use this application that way is there , so will they be able to restrict themselves too REAL CRIME or will they turn their attention to anyone that simply just want too stand up for others HUMAN RIGHTS . I guess only time will tell .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

