<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNA database details of children &#8216;should be deleted&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/dna-database-details-of-children-should-be-deleted/4641/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/dna-database-details-of-children-should-be-deleted/4641/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4318</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kline0</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/dna-database-details-of-children-should-be-deleted/4641/#comment-150606</link>
		<dc:creator>Kline0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/?p=4641#comment-150606</guid>
		<description>Chris Huhne is absolutely correct i believe in making this statement . Remember these are children and most have not even been charged with an offense , never mind convicted . Yes believe it or not i am in favour of D.N.A. being taken from a convicted criminal , even though D.N.A. samples can get corrupted and should be used with other evidence and not as a stand alone basis for a conviction . But these are CHILDREN!!! . What do the police need the D.N.A. for anyway ? . In case they break the law in the future when they are adults . What ever happened to &#039;Innocent Until Proven Guilty&#039; ! . You might as well take the D.N.A. when &#039;ALL&#039; children are born and save the hassle later!!! . Where are the rest of the comments here ? . I bet you will have plenty to say when it&#039;s your child . Please open your eyes . Change never comes by doing nothing! . </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Huhne is absolutely correct i believe in making this statement . Remember these are children and most have not even been charged with an offense , never mind convicted . Yes believe it or not i am in favour of D.N.A. being taken from a convicted criminal , even though D.N.A. samples can get corrupted and should be used with other evidence and not as a stand alone basis for a conviction . But these are CHILDREN!!! . What do the police need the D.N.A. for anyway ? . In case they break the law in the future when they are adults . What ever happened to &#039;Innocent Until Proven Guilty&#039; ! . You might as well take the D.N.A. when &#039;ALL&#039; children are born and save the hassle later!!! . Where are the rest of the comments here ? . I bet you will have plenty to say when it&#039;s your child . Please open your eyes . Change never comes by doing nothing! .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

