<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America: Big Brother&#8217;s big week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/america-big-brothers-big-week/2713/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/america-big-brothers-big-week/2713/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=7660</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Mills</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/america-big-brothers-big-week/2713/#comment-18540</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/america-big-brothers-big-week/2713/#comment-18540</guid>
		<description>If Congress grants immunity to telecommunications companies for any illegal acts they  committed in cooperating with the government, likely any future U.S. presidents will be able to do as the Bush administration did, and cite this as a legal precedent.  
 
Also, now that telecommunications companies are contracting with customers to let family members and friends call one another free, the eavesdroppers will  have the benefit of eavesdropping on each and every one of them, to piece together &quot;evidence.&quot;   
 
As near as I can tell, nothing in the bill the senate passed would prevent  the NSA from eavesdropping on the communications of  political opponents of the president,  and political opponents of people the president supports who are seeking office - for U.S. senator, U.S. representative, state governor, whatever. Had that bill become law prior to the Nixon administration, when Congress asked Richard Nixon if  he knew about the Watergate break-in, he would have had no reason to lie to Congress, since he had the right to obtain electronic communications on whomever he chose. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Congress grants immunity to telecommunications companies for any illegal acts they  committed in cooperating with the government, likely any future U.S. presidents will be able to do as the Bush administration did, and cite this as a legal precedent. </p>
<p>Also, now that telecommunications companies are contracting with customers to let family members and friends call one another free, the eavesdroppers will  have the benefit of eavesdropping on each and every one of them, to piece together &quot;evidence.&quot;  </p>
<p>As near as I can tell, nothing in the bill the senate passed would prevent  the NSA from eavesdropping on the communications of  <a href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/category/politics/" >political</a> opponents of the president,  and political opponents of people the president supports who are seeking office &#8211; for U.S. senator, U.S. representative, state governor, whatever. Had that bill become law prior to the Nixon administration, when Congress asked Richard Nixon if  he knew about the Watergate break-in, he would have had no reason to lie to Congress, since he had the right to obtain electronic communications on whomever he chose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

