<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE DEBATE: UK Passports &#8211; Interview or Interrogation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1945</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Syed Faghurudeen</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/#comment-461799</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed Faghurudeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/#comment-461799</guid>
		<description>I read the both sentences. 
I wish to confirm that whatever resulted in Uk while interview but In India most of the 80% of First Time Passports were refused due to some avoidable reason and it was injustifically refused the right of the people who produced and submitted their Original Identity documents even their national passport,Identity,Driving license,school record. 
But brutally refused by the name of nterview.So my conclussion is that Interview is waste of time and money and it affect and restrict the right of British claim overseas people.so it should be avoid and removed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the both sentences.</p>
<p>I wish to confirm that whatever resulted in <a href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/category/uk-news" >Uk</a> while interview but In India most of the 80% of First Time Passports were refused due to some avoidable reason and it was injustifically refused the right of the people who produced and submitted their Original Identity documents even their national passport,Identity,Driving license,school record.</p>
<p>But brutally refused by the name of nterview.So my conclussion is that Interview is waste of time and money and it affect and restrict the right of British claim overseas people.so it should be avoid and removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve k</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/#comment-32467</link>
		<dc:creator>steve k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/#comment-32467</guid>
		<description>The part of the article that caught my attention was &quot; People will be offered the choice of whether they want a passport or an identity card &quot; . While i agree that safety may be an issue this smackes too me of one way of bringing in identity cards through the back door ! . </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part of the article that caught my attention was &quot; People will be offered the choice of whether they want a passport or an identity card &quot; . While i agree that safety may be an issue this smackes too me of one way of bringing in identity cards through the back door ! .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Lita</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/#comment-31992</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Lita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/#comment-31992</guid>
		<description>Well we already know this isn&#039;t going to help. All that will happen is we will be forced to pay more, have more hassle getting one and give out our biometrics to store on a government database. Once they are on that database there will be no way to get them off it. So sitting back and saying wait and see is too little too late. The damage will already be done. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we already know this isn&#039;t going to help. All that will happen is we will be forced to pay more, have more hassle getting one and give out our biometrics to store on a government database. Once they are on that database there will be no way to get them off it. So sitting back and saying wait and see is too little too late. The damage will already be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/#comment-30996</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/opinion/the-debate-uk-passports-interview-or-interrogation/3057/#comment-30996</guid>
		<description>I think the conclusion is a little of both. The government has to appear to be doing something about the terrorist threat and I suppose these methods have to be tried before they will know if it works. 
 
If these centers are still in operation in 5 years without results then our safety is clearly not the agenda. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the conclusion is a little of both. The government has to appear to be doing something about the terrorist threat and I suppose these methods have to be tried before they will know if it works.</p>
<p>If these centers are still in operation in 5 years without results then our safety is clearly not the agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

