// WHEN Peter Collins expressed his disgust in the Echo at the presence of armed police upon the streets of Cardiff, I suspect his views mirrored those of many readers following the inquest verdict upon the tragic killing of Jean Charles [...] Related posts:
  1. De Menezes coroner slams police conduct
  2. Menezes killers won’t be prosecuted
" />

Armed police untouchable

 

WHEN Peter Collins expressed his disgust in the Echo at the presence of armed police upon the streets of Cardiff, I suspect his views mirrored those of many readers following the inquest verdict upon the tragic killing of Jean Charles de Menezes, who was gunned down in London by the Metropolitan Police.

This unarmed and innocent man was making his way to work when officers fired no less than seven bullets into his head.

Naively, when it was announced that a jury inquest would take place to determine the reasons for his death, I thought that justice would prevail and mete out retribution to those who were responsible.

But this was not the case.

Instead, the coroner did not allow the jury freedom to record a verdict.

He directed that they could only return an open one or, quite amazingly, one of lawful killing.

When they returned the latter, it let the police so far off the hook that I would now fear being in the vicinity of an armed constable far more than being close to a tooled-up hoodlum.

On the basis of the de Menezes verdict, policemen would appear to be inviolate.

Further, why bother to appoint a jury in such cases if the coroner does not allow them freedom of choice when reaching a verdict?

This case demonstrates that the law is still the proverbial ass.

Bill Julian Llanishen, Cardiff

 
 
  • Maximus V

    For many people the Execution style cold blooded murder of Jean Charles de Menezes by police, shooting his brains out using 7 Dumb Dumb bullets one second apart and shooting him 11 times in total, is a complete mystery.

    Why would the police do such an EVIL thing they ask, it all does not make any sense?

    Well, the reason why the jury did not believe any of the police account is because the police account was a total PACK OF BARE FACED LIES!!!

    NO WARNING WAS GIVEN.

    NO ATTEMPT TO ARREST CHARLES WAS MADE.

    CHARLES DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING SUSPICIOUS OR WRONG.

    The Perjury of the police is DESPICABLE!

    HERE IS WHY THE PIG FILTH VERMIN lie:

    Charles was an Electrician, he had been called to deal with an electrical fault in one of the underground tubes just prior to 7/7.

    Charles told a friend that he had witnessed stationary trains in areas of the tube were there should have been NO stationary trains.

    Charles had to be silenced by the police because he was a high witness proving 7/7 was the Inside Job we all know it was.

    Charles was a clean skin, he had NO offences on his record and so would have made a perfect witness had his information ever got out – WHICH IT NOW HAS!!!

    Mr Jean Charles de Menezes was ASSASSINATED by CRIMINAL BRITISH police to keep him quiet!

    The officer who was immediate responsible for giving the MURDER orders was "Common Purpose" operative C. Dick.
    http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/cct…
    http://postmanpatel.blogspot.com/2007/10/cressida…

    Organised CRIME SYNDICATE "COMMON PURPOSE" ASSASSINS MURDERED CHARLES to help keep their man Tony Blair in power and help him bring in their POLICE STATE ADGENDER!

    There is much much more to this crime than written here, there was for example MI6 involvement, MI5 involvement, Juliani Associates as in former mayor of New York involvement and of course the parallel terrorist drills by Peter Powers & his Visor Consultants and his band of liars & crooks.
    http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=630