<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Separating Facts from Fiction &#8211; Why the Official Account of 9/11 is contradicted by genuine Scientific Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/separating-facts-from-fiction-why-the-official-account-of-911-is-contradicted-by-genuine-scientific-research/297/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/separating-facts-from-fiction-why-the-official-account-of-911-is-contradicted-by-genuine-scientific-research/297/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8760</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncleduke316</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/separating-facts-from-fiction-why-the-official-account-of-911-is-contradicted-by-genuine-scientific-research/297/#comment-135875</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncleduke316</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/separating-facts-from-fiction-why-the-official-account-of-911-is-contradicted-by-genuine-scientific-research/#comment-135875</guid>
		<description>What about the claim by popular mechanics and skeptics magazine debunking the 911 conspiracy evidence? what about their engineering and archietcture experts saying you can&#039;t plant those explosives without being noticed and implosions always start with the ground floor going first? 
 
I do note that popular mechanics is owned by Hearst, which donates to the Republican party.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the claim by popular mechanics and skeptics magazine debunking the 911 conspiracy evidence? what about their engineering and archietcture experts saying you can&#039;t plant those explosives without being noticed and implosions always start with the ground floor going first?</p>
<p>I do note that popular mechanics is owned by Hearst, which donates to the Republican party&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

