<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Executions sought for 9/11 defendants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/executions-sought-for-911-defendants/3478/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/executions-sought-for-911-defendants/3478/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8126</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Castelnau</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/executions-sought-for-911-defendants/3478/#comment-56131</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Castelnau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/executions-sought-for-911-defendants/3478/#comment-56131</guid>
		<description>So &quot;murder in violation of the laws of war, attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, destruction of property, terrorism and material support for terrorism&quot; is against the law in USA? 
Then surely someone can start a lawsuit against the US Administrations that terrorised / attacked civilians / violated the laws of war etc against - let&#039;s see: 
Korea 
Vietnam 
Panama 
Nicaragua 
Grenada 
Iraq 
I know, I&#039;ve left quite a few countries out, and many of the US perpetrators are dead now, but why did no-one pursue these criminals at the time, or did they?  
It is evident that &quot;Holocaust&quot; or &quot;Terrorism&quot; is not something that the nice, homely US leaders indulge in. No, it is known then as &quot;Pre-emptive defence&quot;. Sounds much better doesn&#039;t it! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &quot;murder in violation of the laws of <a href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/category/war-terrorism/" >war</a>, attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, destruction of property, <a href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/category/war-terrorism/" >terrorism</a> and material support for terrorism&quot; is against the law in <a href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/category/usa-news/" >USA</a>?</p>
<p>Then surely someone can start a lawsuit against the US Administrations that terrorised / attacked civilians / violated the laws of war etc against &#8211; let&#039;s see:</p>
<p>Korea</p>
<p>Vietnam</p>
<p>Panama</p>
<p>Nicaragua</p>
<p>Grenada</p>
<p>Iraq</p>
<p>I know, I&#039;ve left quite a few countries out, and many of the US perpetrators are dead now, but why did no-one pursue these criminals at the time, or did they? </p>
<p>It is evident that &quot;Holocaust&quot; or &quot;Terrorism&quot; is not something that the nice, homely US leaders indulge in. No, it is known then as &quot;Pre-emptive defence&quot;. Sounds much better doesn&#039;t it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

